In our new category of Letters to the Editor, we are providing a platform for residents to state their opinions, in form of a letter to our editors. This process allows for residents to share their opinions on a larger platform with other residents in the community. We do not endorse any opinion sent in to our publication; we simply provide the platform for residents to share their opinions, thoughts and ideas for our community.
Letters to the editor are straight from the citizen and they are not edited by us in any way shape or fashion.
“Some people may be cheering on the recent City Council motion for a building moratorium on infill lots. Although it may appear to have some positives by a few, like all things there is another side to the story. A side that has to be considered since this action could have severe negative impacts to many and the overall community.
First, it is not entirely clear that these 20-some properties with homes built with higher slabs is the cause for what they are claiming is flooding. Since at least 2020 the City has been receiving concerns from residents speculating about potential flooding issues with this type of construction. City staff, especially stormwater engineers, that I worked with during that time were clear that this type of construction does not result in flooding. Yet three years later, and historic rain events, the construction practice does create flooding issues? Did our City staff outright lie to residents?
Second, many small businesses in our community rely on local construction. Even what may seem like a brief pause being suggested for a small business it could be the difference between staying open and shuttering the shop. Regardless, a moratorium will cost jobs and incomes for many resulting in negative impacts for our local economy.
Third, it’s important to keep in mind that these are homes we are talking about. Homes being built for families that will be moving into. Often times from large distances away without friends and/or family close by. A 90+ day delay in starting construction could mean the displacement of families who simply contracted to build within existing city guidelines. It is no fault of their own, or the property owner, that the city wants time to get its “ducks in a row”. Nor should the City infringe upon the rights of those property owners.
Bottom line is a moratorium on only specific land types would be discriminatory, an infringement on the rights of these property owners, and would have negative consequences across the community. It is a proposed “solution” that does nothing to address the existing homes, is not in response to a threat to overall public safety, is not clear if a problem actually exists, and can have far-reaching negative impacts to jobs and the local economy. The City will have undoubtedly end up with lawsuits that will result in expending a great deal of valuable tax dollars defending the ramifications and possibly even more in damages. Hopefully our City Council will take this matter very seriously, act responsibly for all, and do the work towards a real solution that addresses all sides. Right now, a moratorium on infill lots would simply be kicking the can down the road causing more harm than good.” ~ Brad West
If you would like to submit your own letter to the editor, please email us at editor@flaglercountybuzz.com.
